• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Immigration History

  • Background
  • Timeline
  • Lesson Plans
    • Overview of Major Laws
    • Asian Immigration
    • Citizenship
    • Labor and Economic Priorities
    • European Immigration
    • Family and Chain Migration
    • Gender and Immigration
    • Immigration Laws and Enforcement
    • Immigration and International Relations
    • Immigration Stations
    • Migrations within the Americas
    • Refugees / Asylum
    • Standards
  • Additional Resources
  • Glossary

Insular Cases

1901

A series of Supreme Court decisions that the Constitution only sometimes follows the U.S. flag. Residents of the noncontiguous territories acquired through the 1898 Spanish-American War did not necessarily gain U.S. citizenship or a pathway to statehood.

Resources

Del. Stacy Plaskins (Delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives from the U.S. Virgin Islands) discusses the modern impact of the insular cases.

Discussion Questions

  1. What was the Supreme Court’s decision in Downes v. Bidwell?
  2. What reasons did Justice Henry Billings Brown give in order to support the majority opinion of the Court?
  3. What similarity is there between the racist imagery found in the Puck cartoon and the excerpt from Downes v. Bidwell?
  4. How did Downes v. Bidwell show a shift in understanding of citizenship since the 14th amendment?

Summary

The U.S. ‘s continued expansion overseas not only added territory but also diverse populations of peoples, raising the issue of whether such newly colonized subjects received equal rights of U.S. citizenship. Victory in the Spanish-American War (1898) brought under U.S. sovereignty Puerto Ricans, Filipinos, Cubans, Guamanians, Samoans, Virgin Islanders, and Chamorros of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

The U.S.’s earlier acquisition of noncontiguous Alaska and Hawaii as incorporated territories (1867; 1893) had followed the process established for mainland territories so that they received pathways to eventual statehood and all locally-born residents held birthright citizenship. Hawaii’s majority Asian and indigenous residents were perceived as racially unsuitable, fueling U.S. decisions to develop alternative approaches for newer colonies.

Through the Insular Cases, the Supreme Court decided that the U.S. Constitution did not necessarily follow the flag, thereby authorizing unequal legal statuses and rights for newly conquered territories and subjects. The noncontiguous territories added in 1898 would not necessarily receive a pathway to statehood, nor would their residents automatically acquire US citizenship. Puerto Ricans received citizenship but their commonwealth status precludes eventual statehood while Filipinos became US nationals able to migrate but were ineligible for citizenship. Cubans gained independence but remained subject to US supervision. These colonial relationships fueled migration to the U.S. across the twentieth century.

Source

Opinion of the Court in Downes v. Bidwell Delivered by Justice Henry Billings Brown, 1901

A false step at this time might be fatal to the development of what Chief Justice Marshall called the American Empire. Choice in some cases, the natural gravitation of small bodies towards large ones in others, the result of a successful war in still others, may bring about conditions which would render the annexation of distant possessions desirable. If those possessions are inhabited by alien races, differing from us in religion, customs, laws, methods of taxation and modes of thought, the administration of government and justice, according to Anglo-Saxon principles, may for a time be impossible; and the question at once arises whether large concessions ought not to be made for a time, that, ultimately, our own theories may be carried out, and the blessings of a free government under the Constitution extended to them. We decline to hold that there is anything in the Constitution to forbid such action. We are therefore of opinion that the Island of Porto Rico is a territory appurtenant and belonging to the United States, but not a part of the United States within the revenue clauses of the Constitution…

 

Puck Cartoon: “School begins” by Louis Dalrymple, 1899

 

Primary Sidebar

  • Background
  • Timeline
  • Lesson Plans
    • Overview of Major Laws
    • Asian Immigration
    • Citizenship
    • Labor and Economic Priorities
    • European Immigration
    • Family and Chain Migration
    • Gender and Immigration
    • Immigration Laws and Enforcement
    • Immigration and International Relations
    • Immigration Stations
    • Migrations within the Americas
    • Refugees / Asylum
    • Standards
  • Additional Resources
  • Glossary

© 2019 Immigration History

A project of the Immigration and Ethnic History Society

History department logo LAITS logo