• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Immigration History

  • Background
  • Timeline
  • Lesson Plans
    • Overview of Major Laws
    • Asian Immigration
    • Citizenship
    • Labor and Economic Priorities
    • European Immigration
    • Family and Chain Migration
    • Gender and Immigration
    • Immigration Laws and Enforcement
    • Immigration and International Relations
    • Immigration Stations
    • Migrations within the Americas
    • Refugees / Asylum
    • Standards
  • Additional Resources
  • Glossary

Korematsu v. United States (1944)

1944

This Supreme Court decision upheld the federal government's right to set aside civil rights protections in the name of "military necessity" in ruling on Fred Korematsu's challenge to Executive Order 9066, which authorized removal and incarceration of Japanese Americans.

Discussion Questions

Where does the court justify its decision in this case?

Why did the Supreme Court later overturn this decision?

In this case, how did the principle of “military necessity” conflict with Japanese Americans’ civil rights?

Summary

Fred Korematsu challenged the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 which authorized removal and incarceration of Japanese Americans from the west coast of the United States.  The Supreme Court upheld the federal government’s powers to do so on the principle of “military necessity.” This decision would be vacated in the 1980s, when the courts found that they had been misled by federal prosecutors who hid the fact that there was no evidence of espionage or treason by Japanese Americans. Nevertheless, the courts let stand the principle of military necessity.

Source

Argued October 11, 12, 1944
Decided December 18, 1944
323 U.S. 214

1. Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34 which, during a state of war with Japan and as a protection against espionage and sabotage, was promulgated by the Commanding General of the Western Defense Command under authority of Executive Order No. 9066 and the Act of March 21, 1942, and which directed the exclusion after May 9, 1942, from a described West Coast military area of all persons of Japanese ancestry, held constitutional as of the time it was made and when the petitioner — an American citizen of Japanese descent whose home was in the described area — violated it.
​
2. The provisions of other orders requiring persons of Japanese ancestry to report to assembly centers and providing for the detention of such persons in assembly and relocation centers were separate, and their validity is not in issue in this proceeding.

3. Even though evacuation and detention in the assembly center were inseparable, the order under which the petitioner was convicted was nevertheless valid.

Primary Sidebar

  • Background
  • Timeline
  • Lesson Plans
    • Overview of Major Laws
    • Asian Immigration
    • Citizenship
    • Labor and Economic Priorities
    • European Immigration
    • Family and Chain Migration
    • Gender and Immigration
    • Immigration Laws and Enforcement
    • Immigration and International Relations
    • Immigration Stations
    • Migrations within the Americas
    • Refugees / Asylum
    • Standards
  • Additional Resources
  • Glossary

© 2019 Immigration History

A project of the Immigration and Ethnic History Society

History department logo LAITS logo